Strength Work for Cyclists: Your 1RM, Phase by Phase

Estimate your one-rep max from a set you already did, then get the working weight for every phase of a cycling strength plan.

Start from
Use your heaviest recent set of this lift. The RPE matters: a set with reps left in the tank is not a max attempt, and the calculator corrects for it.
Your numbers

What a one-rep max is, and why the RPE matters

Your one-rep max is the heaviest weight you can move once with good form. Almost nobody needs to test it, and almost every strength plan is written as a percentage of it, which is why estimating it from a set you already did is the useful shortcut.

The estimate needs to know how hard the set was

A set of 10 with four reps left in the tank is not the same as a set of 10 you could not extend. Prediction equations assume you stopped because you had to. If you feed them a comfortable set, the max comes out too low, and every working weight built on it comes out too light.

That is what the RPE field is for

Rate of perceived exertion, on the scale with reps in reserve, turns an honest set into the number the equation needs. RPE 8 means two reps left, so a set of 5 at RPE 8 behaves like a set of 7 to failure. The calculator does that correction for you.

Two equations, on purpose

Epley and Brzycki disagree slightly, and the gap between them is the real precision of any estimate. Showing one number to the decimal would be pretending. The panel shows the range instead.

Every number on this page comes from a published equation that is named in the panel and cited at the bottom. If a calculator will not tell you which equation it used, it is not telling you what its number means.

Why the right weight changes four times a season

A single target weight is the thing wrong with most strength calculators for cyclists. The load that builds force in November is the wrong load in June, because by June the job of the gym is to not cost you anything on the bike.

The four phases below are the plan we prescribe. The calculator turns each one into your numbers, from the same prescription the full guide publishes, so the two pages cannot drift apart.

PhaseWhat it buildsTypical session
Anatomical adaptationMovement quality and tissue tolerance48 min, RPE 6
Maximum strengthForce production49 min, RPE 8, long rests
General strengthHolding the gains alongside riding50 min, RPE 6 to 7
MaintenanceKeeping it when cycling load rises45 min, reduced volume

Sets, reps, rest and RPE for every phase are in the full guide, which also covers the core work that carries no external load.

One consequence worth naming: in three of the four phases the plan uses a goblet squat, not a barbell back squat. If you enter a barbell max, the calculator will say so rather than convert between the two, because a goblet squat max is not a fixed fraction of a barbell squat max.

Will this raise your FTP? Probably not

The 2026 meta-analysis of strength training in cyclists found significant improvements in cycling efficiency, anaerobic power and performance, and no change in VO2max or the power at VO2max. Strength work makes you better at using the engine you have. It does not build a bigger one.

That is still worth two sessions a week, and it is worth saying out loud, because most pages in this corner of the internet imply the opposite. If you are lifting to add watts at threshold, the evidence does not support the expectation, and knowing that up front is what stops people quitting in week six when the FTP test comes back flat.

What it does buy you: force you can put through the pedals in a sprint or on a steep ramp, resistance to the fatigue that arrives late in a long ride, and a body that handles a season of riding without the usual complaints. None of those show up in an FTP test.

How to use these numbers

→

Start from your heaviest honest recent set

Not your best ever, and not a set from a different variant of the lift. If your last squat session was three sets of eight and the last one was genuinely hard, that is the set to enter.

→

Round to what you can actually load

The calculator already rounds to the nearest 2.5 kg or 5 lb, because a barbell does not do decimals. If your dumbbells jump in bigger steps, take the lower one and add a rep.

→

Re-estimate every four to six weeks

The percentage stays the same; the max underneath it moves. In the first two phases it moves quickly, which is the whole point of them.

→

Treat the number as a starting point, not a verdict

If the prescribed weight lands two RPE points away from the target on the day, the target wins. RPE is the instruction; the weight is the guess at how to hit it.

What this calculator will not tell you

Four things, said plainly, because each one is a way a number like this gets misread.

×

It does not know what other cyclists lift

There is no percentile table on this page and that is deliberate. Our app records the RPE and the notes when you finish a strength session, never the load, so we cannot tell you where you rank without inventing it. When we do have the measured data, as with watts per kilo, we publish it.

×

It does not convert between exercises

A squat max says nothing reliable about your row. The bodyweight ratios that circulate for this have no source worth citing, so the calculator works one lift at a time.

×

It is an estimate, and it degrades with reps

Prediction equations are at their best between one and about eight reps. Enter a set of 15 and the range widens, which is why the panel shows a range at all.

×

It cannot see your form

A number is not permission. If a movement is new to you, the first weeks are about the pattern, which is exactly what the first phase of the plan is for.

Where the numbers come from

The RPE scale and the meta-analysis are peer reviewed. The two one-rep-max equations are standard prediction formulas from the strength and conditioning field, not clinical trials, and they are listed as such.

  1. Zourdos MC, Klemp A, Dolan C, Quiles JM, et al. (2016). Novel resistance training-specific rating of perceived exertion scale measuring repetitions in reserve. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 30(1):267-275. PMID 26049792
  2. Epley B (1985). Poundage chart. Boyd Epley Workout, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. A prediction equation in standard coaching use, not a peer-reviewed trial.
  3. Brzycki M (1993). Strength testing: predicting a one-rep max from reps to fatigue. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance 64(1):88-90.
  4. Llanos-Lagos C, Ramirez-Campillo R & Saez de Villarreal E (2026). Effect of strength training on cycling performance: a systematic review with meta-analysis. European Journal of Applied Physiology 126:193-222. PMID 40632222

Common questions about one-rep max numbers